Accessibility links


Sign In
  • Home
  • News
  • The A-Z of Richard Strauss: C is for Copyright

The A-Z of Richard Strauss: C is for Copyright

The composer was a fierce defender of composers rights, and wrote a song cycle lampooning the publishing industry.

By Gavin Plumley (Classical music blogger)

24 February 2014 at 11.50am | 1 Comment

Richard Strauss was a fierce advocate and defender of a composer’s ability to assert copyright.

He was often embroiled in battles with publishers and at turn of the last century helped establish the first society to protect the rights of German composers. The Genossenschaft Deutscher Tonsetzer became the model for other international societies.

These efforts are indicative of Strauss’s business-minded approach to composition. It was therefore particularly galling for him to realize that when Bote & Bock published his op. 56 songs, they had immediately acquired the rights to his next six Lieder. Indignant, Strauss composed Krämerspiegel in 1918, a song cycle which lampoons the publishing industry. Bote & Bock refused to accept the songs and Strauss was forced to compose six more in order to honour his contract, offering three Goethe settings and three songs based on Ophelia’s mad scene in Hamlet. While subtler in message than Krämerspiegel, the three Goethe poems, taken from the Buch des Unmuts (Book of Bad Temper) and Ophelia's wild rants nonetheless helped Strauss vent his anger over the publisher’s greed and his own shortsightedness.

View other posts in our weekly Richard Strauss A-Z series

2014 sees the 150th anniversary of Richard Strauss’s birth. The composer will be celebrated at the ROH with stagings of Die Frau ohne Schatten (14 March-2 April) and Ariadne auf Naxos (25 June-13 July). Tickets for both are still available.

By Gavin Plumley (Classical music blogger)

24 February 2014 at 11.50am

This article has been categorised Music and tagged copyright, history, Lieder, Richard Strauss, Strauss A-Z

This article has 1 comment

  1. .Melian Saburrell responded on 10 October 2015 at 1:03pm Reply

    Heres fumbling with a concept that due credits; called for in copyright, could be feudal.

Comment on this article

Your email will not be published

Website URL is optional